Provider comparison · Malaysia
Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. vs EDICOM SAS
Two Peppol operators that a buyer in Malaysia is plausibly choosing between, measured the same way at the same moment. These are measurements, not a recommendation — they say what each operator reaches and how reliably it answers, and nothing about price, support or fit.
Side by side
| Measurement | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. | EDICOM SAS |
|---|---|---|
| Participants served (network) | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 65 | EDICOM SAS 37,535 |
| Rank in our directory | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. #191 | EDICOM SAS #32 |
| Participants in MY | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 65 | EDICOM SAS 143 |
| Rank in Malaysia | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. #2 of 15 | EDICOM SAS #1 of 15 |
| 30-day uptime | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 100.00% | EDICOM SAS 99.99% |
| Incidents, 30 days | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 0 | EDICOM SAS 0 |
| 90-day uptime | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 100.00% | EDICOM SAS 99.98% |
| Monitored hosts | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 1 | EDICOM SAS 2 |
| Roles on the network | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Access Point | EDICOM SAS Access Point · SMP |
| OpenPeppol certified | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. AP | EDICOM SAS AP |
| Soonest certificate expiry | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. 12 Nov 2026 | EDICOM SAS 05 Apr 2027 |
| Registered in | Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia | EDICOM SAS France |
One snapshot, both columns · data as of 20 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC · rebuilt hourly · GET /v1/providers/public
How to read it
What these numbers do and do not say
- Participants served is reach, not quality. It counts the identifiers we can attribute to each operator from SMP publication. A specialist with a tenth of the participants may be the better fit for your document types or your ERP.
- Uptime is outside-in. We probe each operator's published Peppol hosts from several locations every few minutes and require agreement before calling anything down. We cannot see either operator's internal queues, support response or onboarding time.
- Read incidents beside uptime. One long outage and a dozen brief ones can produce the same percentage and mean very different things for a business that invoices daily.
- Both columns are one snapshot. They were read from the same build, so neither operator is being compared against a staler reading of the other.
Next steps
Go deeper on either one
FAQ
Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. vs EDICOM SAS: common questions
Which is bigger, Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. or EDICOM SAS?
EDICOM SAS, measured by the participants we can attribute to each operator across the whole network: 37,535 against 65. Inside Malaysia the order is EDICOM SAS first (#1 of 15 operators there) and Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. behind it. Size is a fact about reach, not about fit: the smaller operator is often the specialist.
Is Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. or EDICOM SAS more reliable?
Over the last 30 days our probes measured 100.00% for Century Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (0 incidents) and 99.99% for EDICOM SAS (0 incidents). Read the incident counts beside the percentages: a single long outage and a dozen short ones can produce the same figure and mean very different things for you.
Is this a recommendation?
No. This page reports measurements — participants served, market position, uptime, incidents, certification — and nothing else. It cannot see price, contract terms, support quality, the ERP connectors you need, or whether either operator will answer the phone at month end. We are also not neutral about being neutral: we publish these numbers the same way for every operator, whether or not they are a customer of ours. Use the numbers to build a shortlist, then talk to both.
This comparison exists because the two operators are adjacent in the
Malaysia market, which is how every pairing on this site is
chosen — never every possible combination. The URL is
/compare/century-software-malaysia-sdn-bhd-vs-edicom-sas/ in alphabetical order, so one
comparison has exactly one address.