Provider comparison · Singapore
Fonoa Technologies Limited vs Pagero
Two Peppol operators that a buyer in Singapore is plausibly choosing between, measured the same way at the same moment. These are measurements, not a recommendation — they say what each operator reaches and how reliably it answers, and nothing about price, support or fit.
Side by side
| Measurement | Fonoa Technologies Limited | Pagero |
|---|---|---|
| Participants served (network) | Fonoa Technologies Limited 285 | Pagero 14,562 |
| Rank in our directory | Fonoa Technologies Limited #164 | Pagero #49 |
| Participants in SG | Fonoa Technologies Limited 244 | Pagero 488 |
| Rank in Singapore | Fonoa Technologies Limited #4 of 24 | Pagero #3 of 24 |
| 30-day uptime | Fonoa Technologies Limited 100.00% | Pagero 100.00% |
| Incidents, 30 days | Fonoa Technologies Limited 0 | Pagero 0 |
| 90-day uptime | Fonoa Technologies Limited 99.99% | Pagero 100.00% |
| Monitored hosts | Fonoa Technologies Limited 2 | Pagero 2 |
| Roles on the network | Fonoa Technologies Limited Access Point · SMP | Pagero Access Point |
| OpenPeppol certified | Fonoa Technologies Limited AP + SMP | Pagero AP |
| Soonest certificate expiry | Fonoa Technologies Limited 12 Oct 2026 | Pagero 15 Nov 2026 |
| Registered in | Fonoa Technologies Limited Ireland | Pagero Sweden |
One snapshot, both columns · data as of 05 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC · rebuilt hourly · GET /v1/providers/public
How to read it
What these numbers do and do not say
- Participants served is reach, not quality. It counts the identifiers we can attribute to each operator from SMP publication. A specialist with a tenth of the participants may be the better fit for your document types or your ERP.
- Uptime is outside-in. We probe each operator's published Peppol hosts from several locations every few minutes and require agreement before calling anything down. We cannot see either operator's internal queues, support response or onboarding time.
- Read incidents beside uptime. One long outage and a dozen brief ones can produce the same percentage and mean very different things for a business that invoices daily.
- Both columns are one snapshot. They were read from the same build, so neither operator is being compared against a staler reading of the other.
Next steps
Go deeper on either one
FAQ
Fonoa Technologies Limited vs Pagero: common questions
Which is bigger, Fonoa Technologies Limited or Pagero?
Pagero, measured by the participants we can attribute to each operator across the whole network: 14,562 against 285. Inside Singapore the order is Pagero first (#3 of 24 operators there) and Fonoa Technologies Limited behind it. Size is a fact about reach, not about fit: the smaller operator is often the specialist.
Is Fonoa Technologies Limited or Pagero more reliable?
Over the last 30 days our probes measured 100.00% for Fonoa Technologies Limited (0 incidents) and 100.00% for Pagero (0 incidents). Read the incident counts beside the percentages: a single long outage and a dozen short ones can produce the same figure and mean very different things for you.
Is this a recommendation?
No. This page reports measurements — participants served, market position, uptime, incidents, certification — and nothing else. It cannot see price, contract terms, support quality, the ERP connectors you need, or whether either operator will answer the phone at month end. We are also not neutral about being neutral: we publish these numbers the same way for every operator, whether or not they are a customer of ours. Use the numbers to build a shortlist, then talk to both.
This comparison exists because the two operators are adjacent in the
Singapore market, which is how every pairing on this site is
chosen — never every possible combination. The URL is
/compare/fonoa-technologies-limited-vs-pagero/ in alphabetical order, so one
comparison has exactly one address.